Google won a major victory late last month as a Federal
Judge in New York granted
Google’s motion
for summary judgment in Viacom’s lawsuit with YouTube. Viacom, which sued
Google in 2007, accused the video sharing site of copyright infringement after
tens of thousands of copyrighted Viacom videos were uploaded to the site while
Google had “actual knowledge...but failed to do anything about it.” Viacom had
sought damages of at least $1 billion.
Judge Louis L. Stanton
of United States District Court for the Southern District of New York granted
Google’s motion for summary judgment, saying that the company was shielded by
“safe harbor” provisions in the Digital Millennium
Copyright Act. The provisions generally protect a Web site from liability
for copyrighted material uploaded by its users as long as the operator of the
site takes down the material when notified by its rightful owner that it was
uploaded without permission. The decision reiterated that Internet companies
are not legally required to develop and implement filtering systems such as
YouTube’s Content ID
System. Internet companies can expect legal protection as long as they take
down content when copyright holders complain or when the company has specific knowledge
of infringing activity. The judge wrote:
The present case shows that the D.M.C.A. notification regime works
efficiently: when Viacom over a period of months accumulated some 100,000
videos and then sent a mass take-down notice on February 2, 2007, by the next
business day YouTube had removed virtually all of them.
Kent Walker, Google’s
Vice President and General Counsel, said
in a blog post that “the decision follows established judicial consensus
that online services like YouTube are protected when they work cooperatively
with copyright holders to help them manage their rights online.”
The decision was
widely supported as it would protect not only YouTube but also Facebook and
other websites that are largely built with content uploaded by their users. Mr.
Walker said “this is an important victory not just for us, but also for the
billions of people around the world who use the web to communicate and share
experiences with each other.”
Disappointed with the
ruling, Michael Fricklas, Viacom’s Executive
Vice President and General Counsel, vowed to
appeal. Fricklas called the ruling “fundamentally flawed”. “It is, and should
be, illegal for companies to build their businesses with creative material they
have stolen from others,“ he said, adding that “legitimate websites shouldn’t
have to compete with pirates.”
Make your life time more easy take the business loans and all you want.
Posted by: EleanorStewart25 | June 07, 2011 at 10:18 AM
Even though Viacom experienced great losses I can say that it wasn't Google's fault and in addition they remove the content once they receive a notice.
Posted by: holiday rentals london | October 10, 2011 at 06:45 AM