A:
Copyright protection is
available to original works “fixed” in a tangible medium of expression. While there is limited case law on the
subject, at least two Federal District courts have held that the design and layout
of a website is within the subject matter of the Copyright Act.[1]
Registration of a work is not
required for it to be protected under federal copyright law. However, copyright registration does benefit
authors by creating assumptions of ownership and by imposing certain statutory
damages on infringers, not otherwise available.
Deciding whether to
register a website for copyright protection will depend heavily on the
substantive nature of your site.
If the material on your site
is primarily original video or images, it should be separately registered in
its original format, if possible. However, if the original format is web-based,
such as a flash movie, then you should register your site.
If the material on your
site is primarily text, you should examine whether the writing is in fact
copyrightable, and also whether the content should be separately registered. If the
content has only been published on the web, then you would want to register
your website.
If the site has a highly
original and unique design or layout, it may be beneficial to copyright the
site in its entirety. While a site may be aesthetically pleasing, if the layout
or design is not original (in the copyright sense it may not receive copyright
protection under the Copyright Act.
Regardless of whether your
website is registered for copyright protection, you should also consider the
issue of branding. Any trademark or
service mark should be separately protected under trademark law, by filing for
appropriate trademark protections.
Thus, if your website’s content, design and are unique and original, copyright registration will likely be a good idea.
[1] Kantemirov v. Goldine, 2005 WL 1593533 (N.D. Cal.,2005) ("Given the flexible definition of works falling with the scope of the Copyright Act. . .website design and layout. . .fall[] within the general subject matter of the Copyright Act.”). Thestreet.com, Inc. v. Wall Street Interactive Media Corp., 1998 WL 34194887, (SDNY 1998) (enjoining alleged infringer from copying design or layout of website).
Recently, I came across your blog and have been reading together. I thought I would leave my first comment. I do not know what to say, but I like to read. Good blog. I will continue to visit this blog very frequently.
Posted by: Cheap Jordan Shoes | January 17, 2011 at 03:07 AM
*Forget about stupidity, discover your ability.
Posted by: Taobao buy | January 17, 2011 at 10:04 PM